Библиография

1. 1. Иванов-Шиц, А.К., Мурин, И.В. Ионика твердого тела. Т. 1. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, 2000. 616 с. [Ivanov-Schitz, A.K. and Murin, I.V., Solid State Ionics, V.1 (in Russian), S.-Petersburg: S.-Petersburg Univ. Press, 2000. 616 p.]
2. 2. Takahashi, T., Yamamoto, O., Tsukuba, K., and Baba, A., Electrical Conductivity of Solid Electrolyte (Part VI). Electrical Conductivity in a Ag2S–HgI2 System, Denki kagaku, 1967, vol. 35, p. 32.
3. 3. Knauth, Ph. and Tuller, H.L., Solid-State Ionics: Roots, Status, and Future Prospects, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 2002, vol. 85, p. 1654.
4. 4. Kim, S., Yamaguchi, S., and Elliott, J.A., Solid-State Ionics in the 21st Century: Current Status and Future Prospects, MRS Bull., 2009, vol. 34, p. 900.
5. 5. Funke, K., Solid State Ionics: from Michael Faraday to green energy—the European dimension, Sci. and Technol. Adv. Mater., 2013, vol.14, p. 043502. https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/14/4/043502
6. 6. Terabe, K., Tsuchiya, T., Tsuruoka,T., Kim, S.-J., and Aono, M., Current Progress of Solid State Ionics on Information and Communication Device Technology, Ext. Abs. the 17th Int. Workshop on Junction Technology, 2017, p. S4-1.
7. 7. Yamamoto, O., Solid state ionics: a Japan perspective, Sci. and Technol. Adv. Mater., 2017, vol. 18, p. 504. https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2017.1328955
8. 8. Иванов-Шиц, А.К., Мурин, И.В. Ионика твердого тела. Т. 2. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, 2010. 1000 с. [Ivanov-Schitz, A.K. and Murin, I.V., Solid State Ionics, V. 2 (in Russian), S.-Petersburg: S.-Petersburg Univ. Press, 2010. 1000 p.]
9. 9. https://www.scopus.com/.
10. 10. https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/how-scopus-works.
11. 11. Син, В., Ковалев, М. Китай строит экономику знаний. Вестник ассоциации белорусских банков. 2015. № 7. С. 3.
12. 12. Беляков, Г.П., Беляков, С.А., Шпак, А.С. Опыт КНР по реформированию системы стратегического планирования и управления научно-технологическим развитием. Экономические отношения. 2019. Т. 9. С. 1575. DOI
13. 13. Рейтинг ведущих стран мира по затратам на науку. Институт статистических исследований и экономики знаний, Дата выпуска 24.07.2018, https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/221869863.
14. 14. Наука России в 10 цифрах. Институт статистических исследований и экономики знаний, Новости, Февраль 2021, https://issek.hse.ru/news/442044357.html.
15. 15. Уваров, Н.Ф. Композиционные твердые электролиты, Новосибирск, Изд. СО РАН, 2008. 258 с.
16. 16. Сомов, С.И. Частное сообщение.
17. 17. Stangl, A., Muñoz-Rojas, D., and Burriel, M., In situ and operando characterisation techniques for solid oxide electrochemical cells: recent advances, J. Phys. Energy, 2021, vol. 3, p. 012001.
18. 18. Li, X., Wang, H.-Y., Yang, H., Cai, W., Liu, S., and Liu, B., In situ/operando characterization techniques to probe the electrochemical reactions for energy conversion, Small Methods, 2018, vol. 2, p. 1700395.
19. 19. Meyer, Q., Zeng, Y., and Zhao, C., In situ and operando characterization of proton exchange membrane fuel cells, Adv. Mater., 2019, vol. 31, p. 1.
20. 20. Abakumov, A.M., Fedotov, S.S., Antipov, E.V., and Tarascon, J.-M., Solid state chemistry for developing better metal-ion batteries, Nature Commun., 2020, vol. 11, p. 4976. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18736-7
21. 21. Yamada, T., Morita, K., Kume, K., Yoshikawa, H., and Awaga, K., The solid-state electrochemical reduction process of magnetite in Li batteries: in situ magnetic measurements toward electrochemical magnets, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2014, vol. 2, p. 5183.
22. 22. Agarkov, D.A., Burmistrov, I.N., Eliseeva, G.M., Ionov, I.V., Rabotkin, S.V., Semenov, V.A., Solovyev, A.A., Tartakovskii, I.I., and Bredikhin, S.I., Comparison of in situ Raman Studies of SOFC with Thick Single-crystal and Thin-film Magnetron Sputtered Membranes, Solid State Ionics, 2020, vol. 344, p. 115091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2019.115091
23. 23. Gershinsky, G., Bar, E., Monconduit, L., & Zitoun, D., Operando electron magnetic measurements of Li-ion batteries, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, vol. 7, p. 2012.
24. 24. Drozhzhin, O.A., Tereshchenko, I.V., Emerich, H., Antipov, E.V., Abakumov, A.M., and Chernyshov, D., An electrochemical cell with sapphire windows for operando synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction and spectroscopy studies of high-power and high-voltage electrodes for metal-ion batteries, J. Synchrotron Rad., 2018, vol. 25, p. 468. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577517017489
25. 25. Guo, H., Wang, Q., Stuke, A., Urban, A., and Artrith, N., Accelerated Atomistic Modeling of Solid-State Battery Materials With Machine Learning, Front. Energy Res., 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.695902
26. 26. Terabe, K., Tsuchiya, T., and Tsuruoka, T., Solid state ionics for the development of artificial intelligence components, Japan J. Appl. Phys., 2022, vol. 61, p. SM0803. https://doi.org/10.35848/1347-4065/ac64e5
27. 27. Liu, Y., Guo, B., Zou, X., Li, Y., and Shi, S., Machine Learning Assisted Materials Design and Discovery for Rechargeable Batteries, Energy Storage Mater., 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.06.033
28. 28. Lv, C., Zhou, X., Zhong, L., Yan, C., Srinivasan, M., Seh, Z.W., Liu, C., Pan, H., Li, S., Wen, Y., and Yan, Q., Machine Learning: An Advanced Platform for Materials Development and State Prediction in Lithium-Ion Batteries, Adv. Mater., 2021, N.2101474. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202101474
29. 29. Gao, T. and Lu, W., Machine learning toward advanced energy storage devices and systems, iScience, 2021, vol. 24, p. 101936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101936
30. 30. Ling, C., A review of the recent progress in battery informatics, npj Computational Materials, 2022, vol. 8, p. 33. https://doi.org/10.1038
31. 31. Miwa, K. and Asahi, R., Molecular dynamics simulations of lithium superionic conductor Li10GeP2S12 using a machine learning potential, Solid State Ionics, 2021, vol. 361, p. 115567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2021.115567
32. 32. Kahle, L., Marcolongo, A., and Marzari, N., High-throughput computational screening for solid-state Li-ion conductors, Energy & Environmental Science, 2020, vol. 13. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EE02457C
33. 33. Chen, Y.-T., Duquesnoy, M., Tan, D.H.S., Doux, J.-M., Yang, H., Deysher, G., Ridley, P., Franco, A.A., Meng, Y.S., and Chen, Z., Fabrication of High-Quality Thin Solid-State Electrolyte Films Assisted by Machine Learning, ACS Energy Lett., 2021, vol. 6, p. 1639. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00332
34. 34. Sendek, A.D., Cubuk, E.D., Antoniuk, E.R., Cheon, G., Cui, Y., and Reed, E.J., Machine Learning-Assisted Discovery of Solid Li-Ion Conducting Materials, Chem. Mater., 2019, vol. 31, p. 342. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03272
35. 35. Zhao, Y., Schiffmann, N., Koeppe, A., Brandt, N., Bucharsky, E.C., Schell, K.G., Selzer, M., and Nestler, B., Machine Learning Assisted Design of Experiments for Solid State Electrolyte Lithium Aluminum Titanium Phosphate, Front. Mater., 2022, vol. 9, p. 821817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.821817
36. 36. Watanabe, S., Li, W., Jeong, W., Lee, D., Shimizu, K., Mimanitani, E., Ando, Y., and Han, S., High-dimensional neural network atomic potentials for examining energy materials: some recent simulations, J. Phys. Energy, 2021, vol. 3, p. 012003.
37. 37. Zhang, X., Tang, B., and Zhou, Z., Unsupervised machine learning accelerates solid electrolyte discovery, Green Energy & Environment, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2019.12.003
38. 38. Zhang, Y., He, X., Chen, Z., Bai, Q., Nolan, A.M., Roberts, C.A., Banerjee, D., Matsunaga, T., Mo, Y., and Ling, C., Unsupervised discovery of solid-state lithium ion conductors, Nature Commun., 2019, vol. 10, Article number: 5260.
39. 39. Louis, S.-Y., Siriwardane, E.M.D., Joshi, R.P., Omee, S.S., Kumar N., and Hu, J., Accurate Prediction of Voltage of Battery Electrode Materials Using Attention-Based Graph Neural Networks, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2022, vol. 14, p. 26587. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c00029
40. 40. Bhowmik, A., Castelli, I.E., Garcia-Lastra, J.M., Jørgensen, P.B., Winther, O., and Vegge, T., A perspective on inverse design of battery interphases using multi-scale modelling, experiments and generative deep learning, Energy Storage Mater., 2019, vol. 21, p. 446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.06.011
41. 41. Lu, J., Xiong, R., Tian, J., Wang, C., Hsu, C.-W., Tsou, N.-T., Sun, F., and Li, J., Battery degradation prediction against uncertain future conditions with recurrent neural network enabled deep learning, Energy Storage Mater., 2022, vol. 50, p. 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.05.007
42. 42. Shao, Z.-Y., Huang, H.-M., and Guo, X., Optimizing linearity of weight updating in TaOx-based memristors by depression pulse scheme for neuromorphic computing, Solid State Ionics, 2021, vol. 370, p. 115746.
43. 43. Manikandan, J., Tsuchiya, T., Takayanagi, M., Kawamura, K., Higuchi, T., Terabe, K., and Jayavel, R., Substrate effect on the neuromorphic function of nanoionics-based transistors fabricated using WO3 thin film, Solid State Ionics, 2021, vol. 364, p. 115638.